If the threat of nuclear proliferation comes principally from non-state actors, why do we persist in menacing 'rogue nations'?

Splitting Atoms

By MICHAEL KRAIG

As Iran replies to an International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) proposal to process their uranium abroad, just days after inspectors from that agency got their first glimpse of the newly revealed Iranian nuclear site near Qom, it's a good time to take stock of U.S. President Barack Obama's Nobel-winning nonproliferation drive. From the sight of it, there is much good work being done. Bilateral talks with Russia to reduce stockpiles are moving apace. Meanwhile, the U.N. Security Council is considering what to do with troublesome cases in Iran and North Korea. The president has even called a summit of the world's major nations and nuclear energy-capable countries, now slotted for April 2010.

The hope is that these efforts will help check the worst-case scenario from ever taking hold -- terrorists getting their hands on nuclear weapons. But there's just one problem: The United States is looking for nukes in all the wrong places. Nuclear terrorism won't come from countries; it will come from vast networks of operatives with only tenuous links to states. Nor are terrorists likely to get their nuclear material from rogue regimes. Far more probable is that they will steal it or obtain it through the growing global black market. If this is to be prevented, the United States and its allies will have to give their counterproliferation mindset a sweeping overhaul.

Today's terrorist threats are far less tangible than the traditional, state-centric security ones embodied by such countries as Iran, North Korea, India, Pakistan, and Israel. Rather than diplomatic channels, terrorist networks use advanced information technology to advance their ideology, goals, and missions. They are bound by none of the norms and restraints of states.

Of course, none of this is news in the world of counterterrorism. And in the years following the September 11 attacks, the U.N. Security Council passed a set of resolutions mandating that all states take action to tackle nonstate extremists with violent goals. The most important of these for nonproliferation was U.N. Resolution 1540, which calls on countries to monitor and regulate the activities of illicit nonstate actors while securing potentially deadly materials that could be used to fashion a weapon of mass destruction.

Read Full Article...


© 2009 Foreign Policy

 

 


Too Much or Too Little Democracy?
By Oskar Chomicki - November 20, 2009
Comments: 1


TGIF: The Mandated Health Insurance Outrage
By Sheldon Richman - November 20, 2009
More


A Sure Path To Self-Destruction (II)
November 21, 2009 - Comments: 1

A Sure Path To Self-Destruction
November 20, 2009 - Comments: 9
More


P.S.
November 04, 2009

On Hiatus
November 03, 2009 - Comments: 4
More


The Trouble With Disraeli
November 13, 2009 - Comments: 4

Asymmetrical Politics
November 05, 2009 - Comments: 4
More

Senator Hoffman?
By David Lindsay - November 21, 2009

Are The Republicans Stupak?
By David Lindsay - November 20, 2009
Comments: 3

More

 

 

 

Using technology licensed from Unz.org, one or more U.S. and foreign patents pending
Letters@amconmag.com
The American Conservative
1300 Wilson Boulevard Suite 120
Arlington, VA 22209